So, remember that oatmeal cake? You know, the one that tasted pretty good, but was enough to feed an army of dock workers? And it had that disappointing topping. Well, I revisited it yesterday. Scaled it down, changed the topping, and OH MAH GAW, I loved it. The new cakes are simple, unfussy. The kind of cakes you eat after a bowl of something sturdy and frugal, like a stew with potatoes. They might also make a good Sunday breakfast, with a cup of strong coffee.
Bakers are so weird about scaling back recipes. Have you noticed? They’re always like, “Now, now, you can’t just go scaling back a recipe!” But that’s pretty much exactly what I did here, and it worked just fine. I cut it all back by 1/4, thinking it would be just the right size to fill two ramekins. (It seems the years I’ve spent teaching 6th and 7th grade math have finally come in handy. Not to toot my horn, but I can multiply fractions really well. I should enter a fraction-multiplying contest.) Shrinking the recipe by a fourth was perfect. The batter was exactly the right size for two ramekins (I used one round and one oblong. Robert made off with my second oblong ramekin. I haven’t seen it for a week, at least. What on earth could he be doing with it?). The cakes rose nicely, so the ratios of leaveners is correct. They were moist, so the recipe still had the right amount of oatmeal and butter. And the flavor was great, too. Perfect amount of cinnamon.